Thursday, March 21, 2013

LIVING IN DIVINE SPACE by Rabbi Yitzchak Ginsburgh: A Guest Review by Robert John Huffine

 
For most Christians and even most (Gentile born) Messianic Jews, this hard-cover book will be Advanced, when it should be intermediate for beginners. For others, it will be intermediate. And for few, it will basic. And for yet just a handful, it may not be worth their time, other than to present it to their students as a gift. Its well worded for those who want to dwell on The Reception while practicing Mussar in their daily lives. Hebrew Roots "Teachers" like Jim Staley and Michael Rood, never teach this kind of material. Either it behooves them to have to seriously study the Word like never before... or its causing them to fear having to bear the loss of people who follow them blindly, who now realize that they are finally making some progress and don't need to be shepherded by Personalities. I don't know; maybe it's both. 288 Pages with charts. (Linda Pinsky Publications, Gal Einai Institute, Jerusalem [ 2003 ] )

FIRST BLOOD by David Morrell: A Review

 
First Blood is the book that introduced the character John Rambo to the world (although he was initially only referred to as Rambo in the book as his first name John was added on in the subsequent movies). Released back in 1972 (about a decade before the film First Blood was released with--of course!--Sylvester Stallone as the title character) and written by author David Morrell in his first published book, it tells the story of wandering Vietnam Vet Rambo traveling the countryside where he winds up in the "hick" town of Madison, Kentucky where he's picked up by aging Sheriff Teasle who informs Rambo how "his kind" isn't "welcomed" in his "respectable" town. After dropping him off at the edge of town, Rambo ignores the Sheriff's "warning" and returns to town where's he's picked up again by Teasle who arrests him and takes him to the police station. Being locked up causes Rambo to have flashbacks to his days as a POW. He finally reaches his limit when the cops rather cruelly try to shave him without shaving cream. Rambo manages to wrestle away from the cops after slashing one to death with the straight razor. He flees nude on a motorcycle (after having been stripped naked by the cops) and a manhunt ensues. In the movie, Rambo only kills a handful of people (this was done to make the character appear more "sympathetic" to the moviegoing public). However, in the book, Rambo proves to be little more than a murderous psycho as he manages to kill several cops, National Guardsman and even some civilians. Like in the movie, Sheriff Teasle--who's actually a more sympathetic character in the book than he was in the movie who appeared more as a bigoted redneck (played by--of course!--Brian Dennehy)--receives help in hunting Rambo from Colonel Sam Trautman who was Rambo's commanding officer in Vietnam. Also like the movie, Rambo is finally confronted by Trautman. Though I won't spoil how the book ends, I will say that, unlike the movie, things do not end well for either Rambo or his foe Sheriff Teasle. (I'll offer a hint: Unlike the movie, there are no sequels to the book save for the movie adaptations also written by Morrell.) One of the things I found most interesting about the book is that it was written from the points-of-view of both Rambo and Teasle switching off from one to the other. One minor complaint I did have about the book, however, is how the prose started getting somewhat choppy in the second half of the book where Rambo is being pursued by both Trautman and Teasle. I'm not sure if this was done to make the action more succinct or if Morrell was merely in a hurry to finish the book. In any case, First Blood is a pretty taut action novel that also attempts to convey a sort of political message about the Vietnam War (at least that was my interpretation of it anyway). I think it would be of especial interest to fans of the Rambo films--including myself--who would like to see a different take on the character.


Sunday, March 17, 2013

ON WRITING by Stephen King: A Review

 

Stephen King was, at one time, my favorite author. That is, until he started backing away from writing hardcore horror fiction and started writing books about baseball and such (and when I started getting more-and-more into reading the aforementioned “urban fantasy“ novels by writers such as Patricia Briggs, Lilith Saintcrow and Yasmine Galenorn, among others). Anyway, On Writing is one of my all-time favorite Stephen King books even though it’s not the aforesaid hardcore horror fiction that made him a household name. In the book, King gives aspiring writers tips on how to become a successful writer and whatnot. Interspersed with said writing tips are stories from King’s own childhood that helped shaped his writing abilities. To be honest, I’ve always been a fan of Stephen King’s nonfiction writing (the baseball stuff excluded, of course). In fact, I’ve found the “forewords” and “afterwords” to his books just as enjoyable as the book itself, and sometimes even more so. Which is one of the reasons I found this book such a treat. As a matter of fact, Stephen’s nonfiction style of writing--as amply displayed in this book--has been a major influence on my own nonfiction--and even fiction--style of writing (and I’ll, of course, let you decide for yourself if that’s a good or a bad thing!). And, FYI, I’ve also been a huge fan of Stephen King’s short stories of which he’s also compiled into various books (of which I intend to review at a later date).


Thursday, March 14, 2013

SHARYN WOLF VS. JAMES FREY: The Oprah Factor: A Commentary

Sharyn Wolf
James Frey
 

I posted before about how author James Frey was given the third degree--and THEN some!--by the once-almighty Oprah Winfrey--and, of course, this blog's namesake--after he had admitted that he had "fudged" a little in his supposed autobiography A Million Little Pieces that was purportedly about his battles with drug addiction and such. That got me to thinking about another author featured on Oprah's old TV show who, like Frey, was also forced to admit she had "fudged" in her books yet, unlike Frey, she wasn't grilled by the once-almighty Oprah. The author's name is Sharyn Wolf and she was regularly featured on Oprah's old TV show as a relationship and/or marriage "expert" who had authored one or two books on how to have a "successful" relationship and/or marriage. Now here's where the "fudging" comes in: Apparently while Miss Wolf was touting her relationship/marriage "expertise" on Oprah's show AND in her books, her own marriage was apparently in the crapper. Not only that, but the "expert" information she touted in her books as her own she, by her very own admission in a TV interview I saw her give (but, of course, NOT on Oprah's show!), pilfered from other sources. So, the million-dollar question is, did Oprah berate Sharyn as she so famously--or was it infamously?--did on her old TV show as she did James? I got one word for that one: Noooooooo!!!! So why was that, I wonder? Personally, and frankly, I think it was because Oprah started getting some heat from her "viewers" about "supporting" Mr. Frey after he had finally "admitted" that he had in fact "fudged"--at least a little--in his "nonfiction" book A Million Little Pieces (of which he's STILL catching heat for to this very day), saying how his overall tale of overcoming addiction was more "important" than his "truthfulness" and whatnot. Here's a good rule-of-thumb for all my fellow book readers out there: When an author recounts certain events in their life in literary form, chances are that they HAVE "fudged"--at least a little--in their narration (which is probably why James Frey got the "support" of other authors such as the late legendary author Norman Mailer). Also, it might also be a good idea to take with a grain-of-salt whenever an author touts themselves as an "expert" about something unless they have the hardcore credentials to back it up and even then you STILL might want to take their "advice" with a grain-of-salt (Dr. Phil, are you listening?)! In any case, this is just more proof that this is most definitely NOT Oprah's Effing Book Club! 

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

TRAVELS WITH CHARLEY IN SEARCH OF AMERICA by John Steinbeck: A Review

 
Travels With Charley In Search Of America was written by legendary author John Steinbeck who, for those who can't recall their grade and/or high school English lessons, wrote the classic novels The Grapes Of Wrath and Of Mice & Men and a whole slew of other classic books that have been read by countless readers. Travels With Charley might not be as "classic" as some of his others, but it's actually one of my personal favorites. In 1960, at age 58, Steinbeck decided to take a road trip across the country in spite of his failing health. With his French poodle named--of course!--Charley, and with his wife's blessing, he rode across America in a specialty-made camper he called Rocinante after Don Quixote's horse (Don Quixote is another classic novel for all you who feel asleep in English class). In his book, John Steinbeck wanted to see how much America was changing and, at times, he found said changes wanting as he made what Bill O'Reilly (bet'cha never thought Bill O'Reilly would EVER be mentioned in the same sentence as John Steinbeck, did ya?) would call "pithy" comments about things like the increasing number of mobile homes he saw and American's increasing need for instant gratification. I think John made some of his best observations when he traveled down to New Orleans during the time when they were staring to "integrate" public schools. He mentions this group of older women called "the cheerleaders" who were leading the protest against said "integration" in a very vocal--and, as Steinbeck described it, very ugly--way. In fact, John himself describes the show "the cheerleaders" put on as "bestial and filthy" as they shout down the black--and even white--children being ushered into the school. The book was published several months before he deservedly won the Nobel Prize in Literature. Fans of John Steinbeck's fiction will, I feel, no less enjoy this "nonfiction" work of his. And I put the word "nonfiction" in quotes because some critics over the years have questioned the "validity" of Steinbeck's accounts of his travels in his book (like, for instance, author Bill Steigerwald who wrote the far-less-than-classic book Dogging Steinbeck that was highly questionable--and critical--of the book's "validity"). However, as Bill Barich wrote in his book Long Way Home: On the Trail of Steinbeck's America about the book: "I'm fairly certain that Steinbeck made up most of the book. The dialogue is so wooden. Steinbeck was extremely depressed, in really bad health, and was discouraged by everyone from making the trip. He was trying to recapture his youth, the spirit of the knight-errant. But at that point he was probably incapable of interviewing ordinary people. He'd become a celebrity and was more interested in talking to Dag Hammarskjold and Adlai Stevenson. The die was probably cast long before he hit the road, and a lot of what he wrote was colored by the fact that he was so ill. But I still take seriously a lot of what he said about the country. His perceptions were right on the money about the death of localism, the growing homogeneity of America, the trashing of the environment. He was prescient about all that." That's good enough for me! A sidenote: Remember when author James Frey was grilled about the "validity" of his supposed "nonfiction" book A Million Little Pieces by the self-righteous likes of this blog's namesake Oprah Winfrey after she had picked the book for her almighty Book Club and had initially "supported" the book even after Frey admitted that he had in fact fudged some of the "facts" in his book about his battles with drug addiction and such? I can just imagine John Steinbeck being grilled by the once-almighty Oprah nowadays over the "validity" of his Travels With Charley book. Quite frankly, I think people will remember John Steinbeck LONG after they've forgotten the self-righteous likes of Oprah Winfrey (and, judging how fast Oprah's popularity has dropped rather significantly since leaving her once-hallowed TV show to run her own apparently failing TV network, that's VERY likely to happen!).
 

Monday, March 11, 2013

THE DEATH OF RIGHT & WRONG by Tammy Bruce: A Review

 
I’ve, of course, read some stupid political books in my time (reread the review of Ann Coulter’s asinine book and/or Bill O’Reilly’s equally-asinine books). But I think Tammy Bruce’s inexplicably bestselling book The Death Of Right & Wrong really takes the political cake. Tammy Bruce, for those of you who don’t know who she is (lucky!), is a former president of the LA chapter of NOW (the National Organization for Women) who later became a shameless Republican-ass-kisser (Dennis Miller, are you listening?) even though she’s an admitted lesbian, a staunch “pro-choice” advocate and STILL considers herself to be a feminist (at least somewhat so). What’s wrong with THIS picture? And you’ll REALLY be scratching your heads when you read TDORAW. For instance, in the book Bruce gives her “insight” into the rampant Catholic sex abuse scandal by implying or saying how the Catholic Church was “infiltrated” by “gay” priests who, according to Bruce, "joined" the priesthood so they could "prey" on young boys as she accuses "gay" men of being wont to do (even though she starts the book by describing her "affair" with some soap opera actress who committed suicide when she was a teenager yet she doesn't accuse her fellow lesbians of seeking to "prey" upon young girls). She doesn't really offer too much in the way of "evidence" to back up her "claims" save for some "study" done by some--who else!--right-wing outfit (and we all know how "impartial" THEY can be!). And then she praises the Boy Scouts and how they (supposedly) stopped said child sex abuse by going out of their way to (supposedly) keep “gay” boy scout leaders out of the boy scouts altogether. Of course, years later come to find out that child sex abuse was about as rampant within the boy scouts for about the same length of time as it has been within the almighty Catholic Church even though they kept “gay“ men out of their ranks. Oops! While Tammy Bruce may admittedly may not be as, shall we say, bombastic as, say, Ann Coulter, I still think she can be as equally full of . . . well, you know! Personally, and frankly, I think someone--like yours truly!--should remind Miss Bruce that the so-called right will regard people like her as an "aberration" no matter how much she kisses their ass, you know what I'm saying?